Lifestyle Solutions for a Happy Healthy You!

The Antidote for an Overly-Teched Brain

The Cassandras among us have warned for some time that Internet  addiction—obsessive texting, tweeting, posting, surfing, along with a compulsion  to be always connected—threatens to make us dumber, more anxious, and more  depressed. Such warnings are becoming harder to dismiss; a recent article by Newsweek‘s Tony Dokoupil presents  evidence that Internet addiction may lead to more extreme forms of mental  illness. And according to The Observer, social media titans will  gather in February for the Wisdom  2.0 Conference, whose theme will be finding balance in the Digital Age – a  sign that even Silicon Valley is worried about our online habits.

An obvious proposal for avoiding Internet-induced anxiety, depression, or  psychosis, would be to turn off cell phones, limit time online, and engage in  offline activities like reading books or gardening. I have nothing against those  pursuits—I engage in both of them frequently—but I want to suggest another sort  of remedy for Internet addiction which to my knowledge has not been explored by  others. I claim that the performing arts have something special to offer in this  context.

Now, I’m not recommending that people take up the violin or the piano or  start dance classes as an alternative to spending time online. I am recommending  something less obvious, something which may perhaps seem less plausible. I urge  people to become patrons of the performing arts: attend live  performances, music, dance, and theatre.

But how, you may ask, does that address Internet addiction? What is special  about live performance?

Consider what happens when I attend a concert. I go to the symphony and I  hear, let’s say, a work by Beethoven. But I do not merely hear Beethoven’s  music, which I could do at home on my CD player, I hear it in a special way.  Beethoven composed two hundred years ago, and at the concert it is re-created,  one note at a time, by real people playing real instruments, and their activity  occurs now. In my new book, Motion, Emotion, and Love: The Nature  of Artistic Performance (GIA Publications), I argue that the  musicians’ activity of making the sounds is an activity of artistic creation.  Beethoven composed the symphony but this example of it, this  realization, is also an artwork, created by the musicians, moment to  moment, in my presence. An exactly similar analysis applies at a dance or  theatre performance.

At a performance, we are present at an ongoing exercise of artistic creation.  But we are not just onlookers or listeners: we are participants. We know—and it  is the performer’s job to make us feel—that this music, these movements by the  dancer, these speeches by the actors, are for us. This is part of what “stage presence” or “projecting the character” entails. The performer  communicates, the audience feels engaged, caught up in what is happening, and if  this element is lacking, if the audience does not feel included, the performance  is in this respect a failure.

The performer communicates with the audience but the audience also  communicates with the performer. Performers are vividly aware of the differences  from one audience to another; some audiences are “hard,” some “easy.” It is the  responsibility of the audience to communicate, in subtle ways, its involvement  with the proceedings. Doing so is essential because the message communicated by  the audience influences the performance. We should think of the situation as an interaction of performers and audience and the quality of what the  audience sees or hears depends partly on its contribution to the occasion.

Members of the audience do not communicate only with the performers, they  also communicate with one another. We all know the difference between being in  an audience where everyone is caught up in the performance and being in an  audience that is indifferent or even hostile. Part of the thrill of a live  performance comes from knowing that it is a shared experience; we share with the  performers, they with us, and we with the others in the audience (which is why  obvious demonstrations of indifference or inattention, shown for example by  texting during the performance, are so intolerably rude. They destroy the sense  of sharing.)

At a performance we encounter an artwork—a symphony, for instance—but we  encounter it as emerging from an activity of artistic making in the present  moment. In addition to experiencing the symphony as a work by Beethoven we  experience this realization of it as an additional artwork, created by the  performers aided by the attentive involvement of the audience, and we experience  all this in a context of sharing.

Live performance offers much more, therefore, than just a period of turning  off our cell phones. The kind of integrated experience that I claim performance  offers can stand as an antithesis to the fragmented, frantic, never-ending  run-around that some people subject themselves to by spending too much time  online. Performance offers more than a respite, it offers an experience of an  entirely different order. In addition, the sort of attentive interaction that I  claim should occur between performer and audience, and of audience members with  each other, stands in stark contrast to the interaction of a person with his  iPhone. Nothing like it is available—or possible—online.

By  Thomas Carson Mark

Mark is the author of Motion,  Emotion, and Love: The Nature of Artistic Performance (GIA Publications,  September 2012).

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: